Search for: "State v. Daniel W. E." Results 121 - 140 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals Judge Marjorie Rendell offers a judge’s guide to the Supreme Court’s live-streamed arguments, noting that “[w]e are privileged, at least for the time being, to be flies on the wall while the sausage gets made. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:15 am
, (University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 416, 2008).Melissa E. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
CumminsDecember 1, 2016/Pennsylvania Law Weekly Daniel E. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 6:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
’” The Court stated, “[W]e do not know what it means to be ‘arrested and charged with’ a ‘conviction. [read post]