Search for: "State v. Follis" Results 121 - 140 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:29 am
One can only hope that SCOTUS's recent endorsement of the presumption against preemption in Altria v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
To preview my main point: the courts have no business deciding who gets a religious exemption to federal and state laws. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Eric
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
In my dream world, a post like this proves the folly of using these phrases and discourages their further invocation. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
… We ought to go after the Googles with the state's resources and reputation. [read post]