Search for: "State v. Jolly" Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
David Maxwell-Jolly, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, State of California (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
The AmeriKat ready to pounce on any jolly intruderthat dare touch her Christmas tree It has been an embarrassingly long time since the AmeriKat has stretched her US paws, owing mainly to becoming the UnitaryPatKat for much of the past year. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Supplemental brief of respondents Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar Amicus brief of CTIA – The Wireless Association Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
’ If you're not lost by now, you jolly well ought to be. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Jeff Gamso
United States (which I've written about before) and you can read the opinions here. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
Chamber of CommerceAmicus brief of the Defense BarAmicus brief of Retail Litigation Center, Inc.Amicus brief of Altria Group et al.Amicus brief of the Equal Employment Advisory CouncilAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationAmicus brief of Washington Legal FoundationAmicus brief of California Employment Law CouncilPetitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
Granted, a “statement” in a cert denial is a free opportunity to get one’s jollies out, much like a dissent in a 7-2 decision. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission seeks to eliminate the ceiling on what wealthy individuals can donate to federal candidates, parties, and PACs in a two-year election cycle. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:04 pm by The Legal Blog
The Supreme Court in Satya Narain Tiwari @ Jolly v. [read post]