Search for: "State v. Mickey" Results 121 - 140 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
” What would Mickey Mouse say? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 12 to Thursday 15 December 2022 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Aaronson (aka “Dominic Ford”) v Stones (aka “Mickey Taylor”) (QB-2021-001538). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
The Ohio Supreme Court took a look at this back in 2004 in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by Stewart Baker
  It’s more akin to one of Mickey Kaus’s “assignment desk” posts than a full-blown legal analysis. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Is there simply only one Mickey Mouse, the ur-Mickey? [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Testimony: we can’t have Mickey Mouse porn or Superman porn. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am by Andy
No-one mentions that by extending the copyright protection for Mickey Mouse, thousands of employees keep their jobs at Disneyworld. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
And this logic applies equally to self-harm, whether accidental or intentional: The First Amendment precluded liability, for instance, when an 11-year-old partially blinded himself when performing a stunt that he had seen on the Mickey Mouse Club TV program, see Walt Disney Prods., Inc. v. [read post]