Search for: "State v. Nine"
Results 121 - 140
of 7,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 8:48 am
Davis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:39 pm
Sincerely, Steven V. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 pm
A. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:56 am
State of Uttar Pradesh ([1964] 1 SCR 332). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:33 pm
State, 538 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Pama v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
See Morrison v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:51 am
In advance of his 2016 hearing, he filed nine motions with the Board of Parole, among them were motions for: (i) appointment of counsel at state expense, (ii) provision of an independent psychological evaluation at state expense, (iii) an in-person parole review hearing and interview, (iv) an opportunity to present evidence at the parole hearing, (v) access to information related to his parole review and a right to challenge the information, (vi)… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
The Supreme Court held that this can be readily justified by the existence of the nine-year rule, which prevented the Secretary of State from seconding the teachers to the schools for a longer period; and there is no inconsistency between the Staff Regulations and the Directive. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
They issued just one decision, in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:37 pm
A United States Supreme Court ruling released today (February 24) provides an exception to the 1981 Edwards v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:29 pm
was nine years old. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:33 am
Concerned the employment, by the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, of teachers to work in the European Schools. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am
There are some things we don’t know about the leaked Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:31 pm
One, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
The brief fails to mention that the nine states have their own public-accommodation laws. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
Lord Justice Aiken, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed stated ” As Waller LJ has stated, S owed the appellant a duty of care. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
I pointed out that all nine justices, themselves, must ask the lawyers who argue both sides of Trump v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Judgment was handed down on 22 November 2019 (Wagner v Nine Network Australia PL & Ors [2019] QSC 284). [read post]
