Search for: "State v. Null" Results 121 - 140 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am by MOTP
Shamoun, however, the Law Firm would not be precluded from pursuing a quantum meruit claim, albeit of lesser value, even if the contingent fee provisions are null and void as against public policy. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:14 pm
He also wondered how online speech could receive the same level of protection as offline speech, and specifically referenced Marsh v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:29 pm by Mark Theodore
  To the extent such provisions exist in right to work states, they are rendered null and void by state law. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]