Search for: "State v. Sandra W."
Results 121 - 140
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am
the Exclusionary Rule Written by Kenneth W. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Brown 50 W. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
At Slate, Bert Brandenburg discusses criticism of efforts made by retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to promote the appointment, rather than election, of state judges, arguing that “[w]e need judges in our public debates, because no one else can tell us what’s going on from the inside of the courts. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
The second O’Connor story comes from the state of Nevada, where voters are considering a ballot initiative that would change the way the state judges are selected. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
James W. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
A typical example is a 2007 Washington Supreme Court case called Scott v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
Garre, who served as solicitor general under President George W. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
For many years, Sandra Day O’Connor chose to open the questioning in most cases, and thus show the lawyers—and her colleagues—which way she, as the Court’s swing vote, was leaning. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 am
As I noted in Monday’s post, political scientists Chris W. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
Sandra Hatfield, David H. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am
” In non-nomination coverage, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor “said a tough new immigration law passed in her home state of Arizona ‘may have gone a little too far’ and predicted it would be the subject of extensive litigation,” reports Jim Carlton of the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
Garre, who served as solicitor general under President George W. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
For many years, Sandra Day O’Connor chose to open the questioning in most cases, and thus show the lawyers—and her colleagues—which way she, as the Court’s swing vote, was leaning. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
The Wall Street Journal examines states' responses to last Term's ruling in Caperton v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Feinberg, Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC, to Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary, W. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Although Daniel W. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
W. 2d 655 (Iowa 2005); Coston v. [read post]
