Search for: "State v. Servantes" Results 121 - 140 of 1,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 7:00 am
The State also sought a permanent injunction to “enjoin[] Defendants, their agents, employees and servants, from continuing in the business of making taxable sales in the State of Texas . . . until all the taxes, penalties and interest owed to Plaintiffs are paid. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm by Marcia Coyle
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”* A lawsuit where the merits are fully investigated and discussed and the decision is not based on another lawsuit.** The "faithless servant doctrine" states that an individual owing a duty of fidelity to a principal and who is faithless in the performance of his or her services generally cannot recover his or her compensation or other consideration that would be otherwise available to that individual [Murray v Beard, 102 NY 505]. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Today’s case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
  The cancellation of such a large sum involves a modification far beyond anything that was contemplated by Congress in 2003.The Biden Administration replied to this by stating it was also given the power to “waive” requirements of the Student Loan Act, and this would be a waiver of the obligation to repay the amount borrowed. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Sack, Chin and Lohier) says that "the confederate flag was actually part of Georgia's state flag, which Frazier had hung along with several other state flags." [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:23 pm by Adam Levitin
  The background for the rule is that while nonbanks are subject to state usury laws, banks are largely exempt from state usury laws. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Although Trooper offered explanations “for some of the many discrepancies” in his testimony, the Appellate Division said that “this created a credibility question which was resolved against him” and substantial evidence supports the administrative determination.As to the penalty imposed by the Superintendent, the court said “we have observed that ‘a State Trooper holds a position of great sensitivity and trust and a higher standard of fitness and… [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]