Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 121 - 140
of 806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
The appellant was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and claimed her immigration detention was contrary to the Hardial Singh principles and contrary to the Secretary of State’s policy in respect of detaining persons suffering with mental illness. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:49 pm
On Valentine's Day this year, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in the Rajendra Singh Rana case, disqualifying 13 MLAs in the U.P. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 10:04 am
Singh, Yukos Capital Limited v The Russian Federation The Swiss Federal Supreme Court Upholds Interim and Final Award in the Yukos Saga Daniel Quintero Botero, Westmoreland v Canada A Precedent against the Transferability of Treaty Claims Matthew Peter Daminato, Whose Bond Is It Anyway? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
With the Court’s busiest month of the year now underway, Tejinder Singh takes a look back at this week at the Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
He was successful in the High Court before Singh J, who held that the ban did bind the Crown and accordingly quashed the Secretary of State’s decision. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Applying Hardial Singh and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, doing so would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 7:02 am
The Court of Appeals rejects the appeal.The case is Singh v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:18 am
In this context, consider the following from Satterwhite v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:12 am
The arbitrary and unreasonable use and potential to use this power has resulted in a series of judgments (see, Maru Ram, Dhananjoy Chatterjee, Kehar Singh, Ranga Billa, Swaran Singh, Epuru Sudhakar). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
It may be accepted under certain circumstances [See State of Haryana v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am
In the recent South African Supreme Court case of Scholtz & others v The State 2018, ZASCA, the court noted that in determining the existence of corruption, the view is that “corruption is all too often an issue which has to be determined by way of inference drawn from the proven facts. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
" In Surjit Singh, M.D. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Further he found that provided the SSHD applied the Hardial Singh principals, where a reasonableness test is applied to detention, then there was no need for specific custody time limits. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
And asked if the Chairman of the Copyright Board, Dr Raghbir Singh was sufficiently qualified to merit his post. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
