Search for: "State v. Sweet"
Results 121 - 140
of 985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am
The Court says that while inmates must exhaust this administrative remedy, they do not have to wait for the jailers to take their sweet time in resolving the grievances before they can file suit.The case is Hayes v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Islam, 301 A.D.2d at 345, 751 N.Y.S.2d 449; Brancoveanu v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
On political cycles: Here, with apologies to Plato and Polybius, is a short and sweet version of the ancient Greek conception of the regime cycle. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although advisory opinions have been prohibited in American federal courts since the late eighteenth century, several state supreme courts do accept requests for advisory opinions from state legislatures and/or the governor. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
It was the first fan fiction case in China, in which the legal status of unlicensed fan work was tested in court.Here’s what Xi writes: Unconstraint state of mind (?) [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:14 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Judge Sweet concluded that GAF had repeatedly failed to meet this requirement. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
It has sweet-talked the legislature and befriended the executive branch, and at times betrayed us through the judicial branch. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
Moreover, the proclamation’s applicability only to non-visa-holders outside the United States puts it in the sweet spot of judicial deference to the political branches, as the Supreme Court showed in the travel ban case. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 2:58 am
The “Black Book”, as it is widely known, is a comprehensive commentary to the Patents Act and the last edition not only provides updates but also includes substantial revisions of key parts that have been affected by the recent case-law, such as Eli Lily v Actavis, Generics (UK) v Warner-Lambert, Actavis v ICOS and Shanks v Unilever. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Rice-Sherman v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Much of the tax will be borne by in-state companies and individuals. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm
GermanyBILD v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:21 am
State of MarylandPeople v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
Sweet v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
For more information and for a review of the latest changes to state laws, please check out Seyfarth Shaw’s 2019-2020 edition of its 50 State Desktop Reference. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
In Falbo v. [read post]
