Search for: "State v. Waffle" Results 121 - 140 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series will feature a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
 Khadr's repatriation to Canada as soon as practicable.Scruffy Dan has thorough coverage on the court's ruling and the Harper government's continued waffling: The ongoing refusal of Canada to request Mr. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:26 am by SHG
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2006, 8:37 am
Supreme Court's decision in FAIR v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 Oh, important conservatives cracked now and then--Judge Bork waffled on Griswold and Professor McConnell wrote a stunningly honest attempt at an originalist justification of Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence The epidemiology chapter of the Second Edition of the Manual stated that ruling out of confounding as an obligation of the expert witness who chooses to rely upon the study.9 Although the same chapter in the Third Edition occasionally waffles, its authors come down on the side of describing confounding as a threat to validity, which must be ruled out before the study can be relied upon. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:14 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
  East Coast and Hudson argued that the Music Companies’ complaint did not state a claim of vicarious liability for copyright infringement and was therefore insufficient. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
His two main executive orders on immigration, his signature issue, have been justifiably blocked by the courts.Meanwhile, Trump’s foreign policy actions have thus far consisted chiefly of gratuitously insulting foreign leaders and waffling on campaign promises (such as labeling China a currency manipulator and keeping the United States out of the Syrian civil war). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps calculating that the issue would drive a wedge between progressive Democrats (who favor expansion) and swing voters (who either oppose it or who would find other messages more appealing), Biden waffled. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:22 pm by Larry Downes
  The final rule states: A person engaged in the provision of fixed broadband Internet access services, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management. [read post]