Search for: "Strong v Thomas"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,952
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
In a new essay for a symposium on abortion rights being hosted by the Journal of American Constitutional History, I argue that Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Oak Hill (2020) and ACP Master v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Oak Hill (2020) and ACP Master v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
NAPCO v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
[A strong case is made against the ban on gun possession by persons subject to a DVRO.] [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
A franchisor, however, will not know how strong a franchisee’s marriage is today…or in the future. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
This post cannot analyze all those cases in detail but here is one representative example (there are many more).In Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
All of this has left consumer advocates with strong expectations that the CFPB’s funding structure will survive. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Or California v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Is there a strong textual basis for the majority opinion? [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Because even if I lived in Santa Clara county (which I don't), I'd have to admit during voir dire that I have already come to a tentative -- but fairly strong -- opinion that at least certain people in the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office are totally and completely corrupt, and should be in prison.The defendant here is Apple's head of global security, Thomas Moyer. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
at 4; the MQD is a “strong” clear statement rule, id. [read post]