Search for: "Suja A. Thomas" Results 121 - 140 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 6:09 am by Tom Crane
 Suja Thomas discussed this trend in a recent speech at Seattle University to mark the 25th anniversary of the summary judgment trilogy. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm
My friend and colleague Suja Thomas featured The Good Card on her blog The Give Blog this week. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:14 am by Andrew Trask
Professor Suja Thomas (of Oddball Cases fame) has jumped into the debate over proportionality in discovery with a post over at Prawfsblawg. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
The following was written by Suja Thomas (Illinois) on the proposed amendments to the discovery rules of the FRCP, which are a current topic of conversation among civ pro types The discovery rules are hot. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:08 am by SHG
That’s Not (Legally) Harassment The op-ed was written by two lawprofs, Sandra Sperino and Suja Thomas, so one would certainly expect it to be accurate, but since the authors don’t write the headlines, it’s hard to say whether they endorse it. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas, Text-Bound Originalism (And Why Originalism Does Not Strictly Govern Same Sex Marriage), (March 16, 2015).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 6:42 am by Brooke
Thomas discuss their Unequal: How American Courts Undermine Discrimination Law. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:32 am
Suja Thomas discussed her latest project that builds off her intriguing essay (now in printing in the Virginia Law Review) entitled "Why Summary Judgment is Unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:51 pm by University of Illinois Law Review
Epstein Oddball Iqbal and Twombly and Employment Discrimination Suja A. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:13 am by Lawrence Solum
Recent work by the legal historian Suja Thomas has raised the question whether a similar “originalist” revolution may be on the horizon in civil cases governed by the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial. [read post]