Search for: "THOMAS LAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA"
Results 121 - 140
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
The decision was based upon Florida law that property owners do not have any right to the filled-in land and that the state has the right to fill in its own seabed. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
They also claimed that the statute takes their littoral right of direct, physical access to the water, which would be interrupted by the state’s new strip of dry land created by filling and any accretion.The Florida Supreme Court held for the state – there had been no taking under the state's established common law precedents regarding property rights along changing coastlines. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:15 pm
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (No. 08-1151) that the land under the water at a Florida shoreline continued to belong to the state even after the state added new sand, extending the beach and interrupting property owners’ exclusive access to the water. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
Supreme Court considered a "takings" case from the State of Florida -- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Thus, Florida law as it stood before the decision below allowed the State to fill in its own seabed, and the resulting sudden exposure of previously submerged land was treated like an avulsion for ownership purposes. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
“The six parcels of land Florida is buying from United States Sugar include citrus groves, whose sandy soils are less than ideal for Everglades restoration. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
” Florida’s Governor Reed had purchased two thousand muskets for the state militia. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:34 am
Florida, on juvenile life-without-parole sentences, but also of note was US v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Michael Fisher and Thomas M. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Where the competitor is: Florida Crystals’ land Lawyers for the Miccosukees and Florida Crystals said their clients found out about the proposed deal with United States Sugar just a few days before it was announced to the public. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
See Wallace v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:40 am
As Arthur Wilmarth notes, the SCOTUS's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
He is, of course, the author of Parker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
In the case, Morrison v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
