Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education" Results 121 - 140 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
Accordingly, the four-month statute of limitations for bringing an Article 78 action commenced to run at that time.The critical element in resolving the timeliness issue: Judge McCooe said that Gomez’s attempt to resort to contractual grievance procedures did not toll the four-month limitations period, citing Lubin v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 974.The lesson here: delays in filing an Article 78 petition because the employee is awaiting the resolution of a grievance… [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
John Doe (CVSG 11/13/2007) (whether an immediate appeal may be filed if a federal judge refuses a federal government request to dismiss a case in U.S. courts against a foreign government) No. 07-270, Board of Education of New York v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week (subscription or registration required), Mark Walsh covers the court’s denials of review in several education-related cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Syquia v Harpursville Central School District, 568 NYS2d 263 involved the alleged partiality of members of a disciplinary panel convened under the “old” Education Law Section 3020-a.The attorney for Harpursville had advanced the argument that “a 3020-a hearing is, and is intended to be, something other than a fully impartial fact finding hearing, and that the panel members selected respectively by the Board of Education and by the teacher are… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The Court distinguished Economico from the Yonkers teacher case (Board of Educ. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 40 NY2d 268) where the Court held there was no prohibition against the establishment of a limited job security clause in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Nov. 28, 2007) (applying Twombly “plausible on its face” standard in context of fraudulent joinder; denying remand); Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
For example, Sections 2510, 2588 and 3013 of the Education Law, among other sections, controls with respect to the layoff of tenured teachers and administrators employed by a school district or a BOCES.In addition, Rules of the Board of Regents must be considered. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
***The Appellate Division remanded the matter to Supreme Court for its determination as to which was the “official” effective date of Mallon’s promotion to Sergeant.* In Vetter v Board of Educ., Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Cent. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:46 am
Appointing authority’s decision to dismiss a probationary employee found to have violated Department rules sustainedAbreu v Doherty, 63 AD3d 490The New York City Department of Sanitation terminated Cristobal Abreu before he had completed his maximum period of probation. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Board also acted arbitrarily and capriciously in altering the audit standards for Music Choice. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., dismissal was “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” [see Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222],  it probably would have directed Plaintiff's reinstatement with all, or a portion, of her back salary.* A collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, may provide for an alternative… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., dismissal was “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” [see Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222],  it probably would have directed Plaintiff's reinstatement with all, or a portion, of her back salary.* A collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, may provide for an alternative… [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
NFL, while the editorial board of the New York Times applauds the decision. [read post]