Search for: "Test v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 15,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
April 22, 2024) The parties both sell tests for determining when a woman is ovulating. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Testing for drugs is more complex than testing for alcohol impairment and can take more time to get results. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 5:38 am by Lanie Bennett
Chamber of Commerce (uschamber.com); Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
In the same statement, Chew also explained that the ban was “ironic” because “the freedom of expression on TikTok reflects the same American values that make the United States a beacon of freedom. [read post]