Search for: "The People v. Dukes"
Results 121 - 140
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
And in the case of famous people, there is a historic and journalistic interest in knowing what they left behind. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 3:03 pm
From Weller v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
On page 3, the memo refers to the substantial percentage of people who returned to their home country rather than continue in MPP. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:06 pm
Here's the intro: District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Shimm Professor of Law at Duke Law School. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
The ICO blog has a piece about fines imposed on three separate companies a total of £415,000 for sending nuisance marketing to people about car finance, solar panels and funeral plans. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
Both on Lawfare and in a paper last year in the Duke Law Journal, I have described the way the executive branch uses internal constitutional doctrines such as testimonial immunity to thwart congressional oversight. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
AWQC’s submissions on this point included the following: Unlike Warby J, the Court of Appeal disregarded binding case law which restricts the availability of representative actions for damages (notably Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 and Markt & Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:52 am
The lawsuit, Merchant v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:11 pm
Gans summarizes the stakes of Brnovich v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:47 pm
There’s a caricature of US v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:54 am
Prison policies like these violate the Supreme Court precedent set in Turner v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
Cahill, 884 A.2d 451, 455 (Del. 2005); Dan Gillmor, We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People (2006); Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Silencing John Doe: Defamation & Discourse in Cyberspace, 49 Duke L.J. 855, 895-97 (2000); Eugene Volokh, Cheap Speech and What It Will Do, 104 Yale L.J. 1805 (1995). [2] Again, getting noticed is still easier if you have the money to advertise, or the ear of an existing media outlet that will pass along your speech to… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
See Saikrishna Prakash, Why the Incompatibility Clause Applies to the Office of the President, 4 Duke J. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
