Search for: "Town Holding Corp."
Results 121 - 140
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
V Town of Pleasant Val., 304 AD2d 259, 263). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
The Cardinal Chemical court specifically limited its holding to "the jurisdiction of an intermediate appellate court -- not the jurisdiction of either a trial court or [the Supreme] Court"). 508 U.S. at 95. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Danenberg Holdings (2000). (3) 95/001,973 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
Burger Holdings Corp., 897 N.Y.S. 2d 502 (2d Dep’t 2010), again upheld the existence of the isolated franchise sale exemption under § 684(3)(c) provided the franchisor is able to meet the four prongs of the statute. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Danenberg Holdings (2000). (3) 95/001,973 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 pm
East 149th Realty Corp., the Appellate Division declined to review, on an appeal from a final judgment, an earlier order dismissing appellant’s counterclaims and third-party claims. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that the fact that the individual is a “former officer” does not mean that there is no realistic possibility of abusive use of the records against him in litigation, noting that to hold otherwise “would lead to the illogical result that a document ceases to be a personnel record immediately upon the officer's severance from employment. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Town of Ramapo, USSC, Second Circuit, Docket 18-148-cv* The single issue before the court in this appeal was whether Raymond K. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Town of Ramapo, USSC, Second Circuit, Docket 18-148-cv* The single issue before the court in this appeal was whether Raymond K. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 3:35 pm
First Meridian Planning Corp. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:27 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., the Supreme Court made clear that not all definitions of an exemption are to be narrowly construed against employers. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:02 pm
According to the TDO, BIS has evidence to believe that the vessel is destined for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps for use as an attack craft. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:58 am
ExitExchange Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:29 pm
“It’s not like the charges can be dropped, there still can be a retrial, but we hope that he can come home and hold his daughter. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:40 am
See, e.g., Town of Wallkill v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:30 am
Try contacting your local (town, city, county or state) environmental agency. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
Town of GuilderlandU.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:30 am
Try contacting your local (town, city, county or state) environmental agency. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In any case, there is a new FTC sheriff in town, and a newly-used FTC enforcement power: This certainly could be a signal that more of the same is to come. [read post]