Search for: "U. S. v. Long" Results 121 - 140 of 3,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am by Michael Lowe
  Another famous informant:  Lando Calrissian, who informed on Han Solo to the Empire, resulting in Han Solo spending a very long time frozen in carbonate on Jabba the Hut’s wall in “Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Full disclosure – I’m a member and earn enough for one very modest lunch a year – which is more than some serious academic friends of mine.AC’s incompetence and inability to fairly distribute its revenues to its creators has been known and documented for a long time, most famously in the 2007 report by Martin Friedland, former Dean of U of T Law School. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Surely the Court’s concept of “cognizable” legal injury will require further elaboration before long. [read post]