Search for: "U. S. v. Strong"
Results 121 - 140
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 10:24 am
" Ziglar, 582 U. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 2:24 pm
Matter of Joseph S. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:37 am
Patel v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
U-G-L-Y. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:05 am
In Ramirez v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
” In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
That’s a good thing. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:29 am
If this question interests you, Robinson’s decision in National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
S. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on… [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:38 pm
" 42 U. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Today's decision in Knight v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:33 pm
It had the letter V on its side. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
But that's not exactly what the proposed bill would do.To be sure, language in Bigelow v. [read post]
