Search for: "U.S. v. McConnell" Results 121 - 140 of 507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am by James Romoser
” Briefly: In a New York Times op-ed, U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
” Writing for the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That is, even as Republicans have largely won their decades-long war against labor unions in the private sector (allowing most private companies to quickly drop their pension plans), the public sector is the one remaining stronghold of workers’ power.This issue arose in 2018’s Janus v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
This appears to be why Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reconvened the Senate on May 4, despite Monahan’s warnings. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am by William Ford
Rob Portman and Dick Durbin introduced a resolution in late March to allow for remote votes and proceedings, which I describe in detail below, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has shown little interest in moving the resolution forward. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm by CAFE
Here’s what will work,” John Bellinger, Washington Post op-ed, 4/23/20 “Congress hands Obama first veto override,” Politico, 9/28/16 MCCONNELL STATE BANKRUPTCY COMMENTS Clip: Mitch McConnell expresses support for allowing states to go bankrupt, Hugh Hewitt radio show, 4/22/20 “McConnell takes flak after suggesting bankruptcy for states rather than bailouts,” Washington Post, 4/23/20 SUPREME COURT  Ramos v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
And Hannah Kris shared Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s proposed rules for the trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
The earliest of these cases involved Judge John Pickering (1804, U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
But McConnell’s desired process would implicitly make an important concession about the evidence against the president. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
McConnell’s negative responsebrought Democratic charges of a cover-up. [read post]