Search for: "U.S. v. Peters*" Results 121 - 140 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the justices heard argument in Knick v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Patrick Gregory writes that “[w]omen judges may become front-runners to fill the vacancy on the U.S. [read post]
As Philip Lacovara, who served as counsel to Jaworski and argued U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364,395 (1948); see also Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Supreme Court holdings, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Virginia employers) recently reaffirmed in Liverman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Supreme Court holdings, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Virginia employers) recently reaffirmed in Liverman v. [read post]