Search for: "US Steel Corp. v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am by INFORRM
There should be “no unnecessary barriers” to the use of justification (McDonald’s Corp v Steel [1995] 3 All ER 615), and a defendant should be able to enjoy “a full opportunity to make good whatever defence he has” (Basham v Gregory (unreported, 21 February 1996 CA) per Lord Bingham MR). [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
  Both Commerce's rationale in departing from its long-followed policy of not lodging CVD actions against non-market economies (see Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
Steel Corp. concerned workers at an 800-employee United States Steel plant in Gary, Indiana, who complained about not being compensated for their time putting on and taking off required work clothes and walking from the locker room to their work stations and back. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
United States Steel Corp., 881 N.E.2d 1065 (Ind. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm by Bill Ward
The present beach replenishment project to be overseen by the Army Corps of Engineers is fully funded by the Federal and State Government. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314 (use of the term “steel baffles” “strongly implies that the term ‘baf- fles’ does not inherently mean objects made of steel”). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
Ibrahiem KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant Cannot Use Prior Order Denying Discovery Of Non-Party Wife as Shield; Disclosure Compelled Garzillo v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
  So we all know how extensively Agent Orange was used by the US Government throughout the 1960s and 1970s. [read post]