Search for: "US v. McKenzie"
Results 121 - 140
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 7:22 am
In last week’s case (Christen v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Baker & McKenzie LLP, considered whether trade-mark use occurred when goods are purchased online using flyers. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
The copies temporarily retained on the screen or in the cache are merely an incidental consequence of using a computer to view the material. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm
Mary's Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
Miller, Washington & Lee University (US) · Piecemeal Legal Origins, Alessandro Romano, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome (Italy) · Diffusion: On the Role of Translation in Circulating Legal Patterns, Sieglinde E. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:29 am
Here they are: McKenzie Banking Company v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:42 am
Larry James Ensor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:56 pm
Mercer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
(h/t Baker & McKenzie IT updates) [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:16 am
McKenzie v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
Out of the Jungle: Copyright and Fair Use at Georgia State - Good summary by Betsy McKenzie with links to additional posts and articles regarding the whole copyright case involving GSU.Another good post: Decision Summary: Publishers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
We’ve been asking for this for some time, have written to the Lord President and to all MSPs and then we learn the day before we’re in court the change is coming, which is great, but five days too late to be any use to us. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
By 6 April I was contacted by Tony Mercer, Napo National Vice Chair with responsibility for the Napo Family Court Section in Cafcass and the Napo Family Court Committee where, I was told, the blog had already triggered some “very useful discussions”. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
By Eric Goldman Karnaby v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
See Flaskamp v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:56 am
Again there are long lists of useful tips: What constitutes a good price? [read post]
