Search for: "US v. Michael Jacobs" Results 121 - 140 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Chien & Michael Risch, Recalibrating Patent Venue, Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
Michael Piatetsky, an architect, died of colorectal cancer. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am by Amy Howe
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Neil McEvoy, who leads the Plaid Cymru group in Cardiff council, faces the bill after pulling out of a libel action he brought against Labour councillor Michael Michael. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
Texas has more than its share of prosecutors like Dale Cox—the facts leading up to the Michael Morton Act is reminds us of clear evidence of this assertion. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
Expect contributions from Professor Sir Robin Jacob (UCL Laws), Antoine Dore (ITU), Michael Loch (GSMA), Christian Loyau (ETSI) and Professor Marty Adelman (George Washington University). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire and Chantal Valery of Agence France-Press (via Business Insider); commentary comes from Michael Wara in the Stanford Lawyer, Lisa Soronen at the Knowledge Center, Seth Jaffe at Law and the Environment, John Burton at the World Socialist Web Site, and Richard Revesz at The Hill. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
  A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am by Amy Howe
  Lisa Soronen weighs in at the Appellate Practice Blog of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, while at Verdict Michael Dorf uses the decision to illustrate and criticize the breadth of qualified immunity protection under the Court’s precedent. [read post]