Search for: "US v. Walgreen Co."
Results 121 - 129
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Walgreen Co., 18-349Issues: (1) Whether an accommodation that merely lessens or has the potential to eliminate the conflict between work and religious practice is “reasonable” per se, as the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Walgreen Co., and the government recommended that Hardison be reconsidered and overruled in that case. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Studies repeatedly show that it is safe and effective for its intended uses. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:55 am
Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
" Similarly, in Great Plains Container Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
Supreme Court found in Staub v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As discussed here, last year, the Seventh Circuit, in a blistering opinion written by Judge Richard Posner in a merger objection lawsuit involving Walgreen’s acquisition of Alliance Boots, affirmatively adopted the Delaware Chancery Court’s position on disclosure-only settlements. [read post]
