Search for: "USA V. RIVERS" Results 121 - 140 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
  I won't bother noting that the DC Circuit, were it to sit in judgment on whether the Fed could buy the world's largest insurer, would undoubtedly conclude that the plain language of its governing statute (which is to make emergency loans, not require takeovers in exchange) would not permit the takeover under Chevron USA v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:13 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Jacoby v Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Englewood, 2015 WL 6160248 (NJ Super. 10/5/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances Tagged: parking [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
Indeed, there’s a recent very important decision in the USA – which though not binding in Canada – could be very influential. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s supplemental brief Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Big River Resources Galva, LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Hasbro – District Court Massachusetts awards Hasbro injunction in water pistol patent case: Hasbro Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:39 am by Anna Christensen
  Looking forward, the New York Times reports on next week’s upcoming argument in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]