Search for: "USA v. All Right, Title " Results 121 - 140 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Madden ("Madden") back pay, front pay, and compensatory damages on his claim that CWS terminated his employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
 Because these rights are required by the Berne Convention (for all works, a fact conveniently overlooked by Congress), Congress added an exception to the registration requirement, for “an action brought for a violation of the rights of the author under section 106A(a). [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 6:12 am
A case filed on July 10, 2009 in the New York Eastern District Court by Miguel Agui, Alexander Reyes and James Gipson v T-Mobile USA will provide the answer. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am by Conor McEvily
Nassar, the Court is considering what standard of proof should apply to retaliation claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Philip Morris USA, Inc., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Virginia) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 09-329 Title: Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
” The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, Bloomberg, the Associated Press, CNN, Reuters, the ABA Journal, NPR, USA Today, the Christian Science Monitor, The Atlantic, UPI, Courthouse News Service, JURIST, ACSblog, and CPR all have additional coverage of and commentary on the decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
  But the sentiment was certainly not shared by all. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The case is Altadis USA v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:48 pm
  OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0171p.06 2007/05/14 Valentine v. [read post]