Search for: "United States of America v. RES Holdings" Results 121 - 140 of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
On August 30, 2013, the Texas Supreme Court decided two cases involving the Episcopal Church of the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Ukraine also requested the President of the Court “pursuant to Article 74 (4) of the Rules of Court . . . to call upon the Russian Federation to immediately halt all military actions in Ukraine pending the holding of a hearing, to enable any order the Court may make on the request for provisional measures to haveits appropriate effects”.7. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 6:23 am
"Addressing the issue of non bis in idem, the MMFR concluded in its Extradition Order that "the acts for which [Salinas] is requested for extradition by the government of the United States of America ... are different from those for which he is being tried by Mexican legal authorities," particularly given that the extradition request was based on "acts committed in the United States of America," and that Salinas had… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am by Sheppard Mullin
On October 2, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of defendant airline carriers[1] accused of conspiring to reduce, cap and ultimately eliminate the base commissions paid to travel agents selling defendants’ airline services in In re Travel Agent Commission Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia:  In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States held in the case of Voisine v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Article II, Section 1 says that “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]