Search for: "United States v. American Express Co." Results 121 - 140 of 1,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
Bellaizac-Hurtado, 700 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2012) • Elena Kagan, American Express Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Second, in interpreting the Convention, the Court should take into account the interpretations of treaties in the United Nations, Inter-American and African human rights systems, which have each interpreted their respective treaties as applying to all situations in which States Parties are in a position to harm the rights of people outside their borders or to regulate a private actor whose conduct can harm the rights of people outside their borders. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Naturally, both sides have expressed optimism that a resolution is close. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
’ . . .In February 2011 the defendant and his co-conspirators targeted a publicly traded credit and debit card processing company based in the United States that processed transactions for prepaid debit cards issued by the American Red Cross for disaster relief victims. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]