Search for: "United States v. Cardinal"
Results 121 - 140
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States through Employment Div. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
Marijuana is the most lucrative cash crop in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
United States, which decided that a federal statute that referred to “labor” only applied to manual labor and not “professional” services. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:41 am
California and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:59 pm
Spicer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
(Though, in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
Cardinal Indus., Inc., 145 F.3d 1303, 1309 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
V. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:46 am
This, I argue, contributes to the development of a distinctive settler-state political theory which is premised on the cardinal importance of indigeneity and tribalism in settler-state constitutionalism, and on the enduring relevance of descent as a source of political and legal status in settler societies. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Cardinal Indus., Inc., 1 F. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
He was wanted by officials in the United Arab Emirates for a string of dodgy deals in Dubai. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
” PPG Indus., Inc., 75 F.3d at 1564 (citation and quotation omitted).ANDSee United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
’” (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
In Schenck v. [read post]
