Search for: "United States v. Michael Stephens" Results 121 - 140 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by admin
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by Schachtman
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm by Daniel Harawa
Justice Stephen Breyer pressed Jaicomo about the policy implications of his position, stating that under Jaicomo’s reading of the FTCA, a plaintiff could collect damages from both the United States and the employee. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Urgenda Foundation Niccolò Ridi, United States—Anti-dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada Piotr Uhma, Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18 Hannah Woolaver, R v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a statement in open court in the case of Michael Turner v News Group Newspapers Limited. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am by Scott Bomboy
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Stephen Skowronek and Karen Orren might use the phrase “intercurrence” to describe their relationship. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am by Michael Boyd
Panetta was a lawsuit filed in 2012 challenging the targeted drone killings by the United States of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
Lee (Trump 2019, replacing Stephen Reinhardt), joined by Consuelo M. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
After many unsuccessful attempts to leave the U.S.S.R. and its oppressive regime, Somin and his family managed to vote with their feet for greater liberty in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  [6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the… [read post]