Search for: "United States v. National Football League"
Results 121 - 140
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010), where the Supreme Court held that NFL and NFL Properties, the league’s intellectual property licensing arm, were capable of engaging in a conspiracy within the meaning of Section 1 is potentially distinguishable. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
National Football League v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
NFL – holding that the National Football League is not a single entity exempt from antitrust laws – drew most of the attention. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Other Professional Sports Moreover, GINA will have increased significance in regards to the National Basketball Association and the National Football league and their current players. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Consider the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
He is one of only 48 workers' compensation attorneys in the United States authorized by the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) to represent its members. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
This does not just include the well-publicised incidents involving Premier League superstars. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
(“HNH”), the owner of the Houston Texans franchise of the National Football League. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
(relisted after the Oct. 16 conference) Returning Relists National Football League v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court decision, NCAA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Over 70 million Americans intend to bet on a National Football League game during the 2023-2024 season, a more than 50 percent increase from the previous season. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
IPKat has a post on the extension of a live blocking order in favour of the Football Association Premier League. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator… [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
