Search for: "United States v. Pointer"
Results 121 - 140
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm
” — this might qualify as either incitement of imminent criminal conduct, or as constitutionally unprotected solicitation of crime (see United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm
This up-to-date analysis includes: A practical explanation of Section 468B settlement funds; When and how to use them; Statutory and regulatory background for designated settlement funds (DSFs) and qualified settlement funds (QSFs); Discussion of the Tenth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Background The major impetus for science tutorials seems to have come from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Dorr v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:50 pm
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 923-24 (1997); a few comments are appropriate. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
They also referred his case to the Secretary of State with a view to him being barred from working with children. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office “The adults in the room” (direct quote) know you have to pay for patents or you’re going to get sued. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Pettitt v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982) which held the 29 USC 216 controls settlements on this type of case, and allows only Court approved or Department of Labor approved cases. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:26 pm
United States (1928) 277 U.S. 438, 470 (dis. opn. of Holmes, J.).) [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:42 am
Pinterest is a US-based company, and as far as I could tell with a simple traceroute, all of their content seems to be hosted in the United States. [read post]
