Search for: "United States v. Sandoz"
Results 121 - 140
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Illinois 13-5967Issue: Whether a defendant is acquitted for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where a court grants a motion for directed verdict after the prosecution refuses to present any evidence at trial to the empaneled and sworn jury. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:49 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on June 23, 2011. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
Leggett & Platt, Inc. the Federal Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas for the alleged infringer, Leggett & Platt. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Sandoz Inc., 2013 WL 308768 (S.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1435–36 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Teva, Barr and APP all appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Teva, Barr and APP all appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
According to court filings, the shipments of thiopental entering the United States came from an Austrian facility owned by Sandoz International GmbH. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:13 am
Joe represents one of the successful moving defendants in the very recent decision that's described below.Take it away Joe:*****************On January 30, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of Sandoz Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., and Hospira, Inc. with respect to all remaining plaintiffs in the generic pamidronate… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
Upon the filing of the ADNA, Lilly's patent attorneys immediately filed this patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court of New Jersey. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:56 am
See, e.g., Sandoz v. [read post]
