Search for: "United States v. Steven Davis" Results 121 - 140 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Partakis-Stevens & Anor v Sihan & Ors (2022) EWHC 3249 (TCC) – Nuisance claim for water run-off from adjoining garden after landscaping works. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
”  And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Tejinder Singh
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 477 n.9 (Cal. 1988); Stevens v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States:  According to UPI, a libel insurance issue has derailed the pending release of a documentary entitled “Unlawful Killing” about a supposed coverup of the death of Princess Diana. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
Workers’ rights and the Supreme Court — Joseph Seiner, The Supreme Court’s New Workplace: Procedural Rulings and Substantive Worker Rights in the United States (Cambridge University Press 2017): Seiner argues that the Supreme Court has systematically eroded the rights of minority workers through subtle changes in procedural law. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]