Search for: "United States v. Union Manufacturing Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878), and not on International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Bay Mills Indian Community, the United States Supreme Court held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) did not implicitly or explicitly abrogate the common law doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity so as to allow a state to file a federal suit against an Indian tribe for illegal gambling activity taking place outside of Indian country. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
The case was Steele v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The Federal Constitutional Court shall rule on the question ofunconstitutionality.(3) Details shall be regulated by federal laws.* * * Article 23 [European Union – Protection of basic rights –Principle of subsidiarity](1) With a view to establishing a united Eur [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
In 1982, JM sold the Stockton facility to the J-M Manufacturing Co., and the J-M A/C Pipe Corp., which were unaffiliated with JM. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
Universal which found that manufacturers of home video player/recorder devices such as Betamax or other VCRs could not be liable for infringement - overturning the The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which had found the manufacturers of betamax manchines liable for contributory infringement. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
All of these manufacturing corporations form part of Apparel Mart’s “supply chain. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
In Netto Marken-Discount AG & Co. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said, “The justices have set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
