Search for: "United States v. William Hill" Results 121 - 140 of 458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Carnegie Endowment President William J. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm by Sheldon Gilbert
Rock, of Boston, as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host a briefing, Future of the Rule of Law, CICIG, and Justice Reform in Guatemala, featuring Representative Norma Torres (D-CA), and an expert panel including Brittany Benowitz, Ambassador William Brownfield, Leah Campos, Claudia Escobar, Peter Lamport and Mark L. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9560, involves a defendant who came to the U.S. from the United Arab Emirates on a student visa. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
William John Hanna who held the seat for Lambton County West for the Conservative Party from 1902 to 1918, and was the head of a successful local law firm…introduced young Patrick to the business of legal practice. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
According to SCOTUS Watch, which “tracks the public statements made by United States senators about how they plan to vote,” 31 Republicans are “likely yes” and 16 (including McCain) are “definitely yes” on the confirmation. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]