Search for: "WAL-MART STORES EAST" Results 121 - 140 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm by Law Lady
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP, Appellee. 2nd District.Torts -- Automobile accident -- Rear-end collision -- Evidence -- Damages -- Claim that trial court, in granting plaintiff's motion in limine, improperly precluded defendants from presenting testimony that the amount of damages plaintiff was claiming was not reasonable or necessary for the injuries at issue was not preserved for appeal where no transcript of hearing on motion in limine was in the record and… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm by Kim Zetter
(Story updated 15:45 EDT) See also: Alleged Carder ‘BadB’ Busted in France Suspect in RBS WorldPay Hack Extradited to the U.S. 4 Hackers Indicted in $9.5 Million Bank Card Attack 5 More Indicted in Probe of International Carding Ring PIN Crackers Nab Holy Grail of Bank Card Security Big Box Breach: The Inside Story of Wal-Mart’s Hacker Attack Global ATM Caper Nets Hackers $9 Million in One Day [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 12:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The bribery related securities suit against Wal-Mart Stores settled for $160 million. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
., in the Wal-Mart case) was that one could not recover punitive damages for failure to pay a penalty. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
. *** Cimato Brothers, Inc. and Cimato Brothers Construction, Inc. (3-CA-25918; 352 NLRB No. 99) East Amherst, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
  The Respondent also contended that it had no obligation to bargain about changes in route and store assignments because such changes were consistent with an alleged past practice of maintaining a dynamic status quo in which the stores assigned to sales employees and drivers varied daily. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118, 1127 (Ill. 2002) (applied to pharmacists); Hansen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am by Schachtman
The Advisory Committee notes to the year 2000 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 included a comment: “A review of the case law after Daubert shows that the rejection of expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
East Bay Regional Park District (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 353. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Though P is not the retail store at which Zeidenberg bought the CD. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
.) *** Detroit East, Inc. (7-RD-3494; 349 NLRB No. 87) Detroit, MI April 30, 2007. [read post]