Search for: "WELLS v. WYETH" Results 121 - 140 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
March 7, 2011) (discussing this issue in detail).Well, with all due respect to the district court (probably gunshy, and not at all happy, after being reversed by the Seventh Circuit) it is well past time to cut this plaintiff "off at the knees." [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
  The facts sound rather like Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  [The expert] testified as to the well-recognized unreliability . [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Bexis
  So we’ve decided to take the plunge.We don’t have much quarrel with Dean Chemerinsky’s initial observation that the existing regime for preemption and prescription drug product liability litigation, fashioned by the trilogy of Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm by Bexis
  Because (as counsel noted) we are interested in preemption issues – even hard ones for our side, which certainly includes preemption in innovator drug cases post-Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *25-26 n.8 (citing Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Wyeth, Inc., 37 A.3d 549, 570 (New Jersey Super. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:25 am by Bexis
Wyeth, ___ F.3d ___, No. 12-13263, slip op. (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Well, the First Circuit just had its bluff called. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  That’s a long way from the sweeping presumption language in Wyeth v. [read post]