Search for: "Washington v. US et al" Results 121 - 140 of 1,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
There are several ways that irrigation canal water may have come in contact with the implicated romaine lettuce including direct application to the crop and/or use of irrigation canal water to dilute crop protection chemicals applied to the lettuce crop, either through aerial or ground-based spray applications. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The standard aims to bring transparency to “the way in which algorithmic tools are being used to support decisions” and especially those decisions with “legal or economic impact on individuals. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York is followed by California (43.4 percent of consumption smuggled), Washington (42.6 percent), New Mexico (37.2 percent), and Minnesota (35.2 percent). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
That is because, in TTM’s plan, literally everyone pays for the industrial decarbonization of the US steel sector, except for the US steel sector. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Donohue et al., Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime: A Comprehensive Assessment Using Panel Data and a State-Level Synthetic Control Analysis, 16 J. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 9:37 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Outside Statements On August 24, 2021, OCR also issued a letter addressing the federal court’s decision in Victim Rights Law Center et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]