Search for: "Whitney v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg) United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Supreme Court decisions will likely impact companies' drafting of arbitration provisionsDiaz ReusTwo recent United States Supreme Court decisions present significant new developments on the scope and interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 6:32 am
United Tech. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
" United States, ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
(Tangible IP) Ireland Irish ISP and major music labels ready to disconnect pirates (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) Sweden Hollywood lands triple strike on Pirate Bay, OpenBitTorrent (TorrentFreak) Switzerland Free speech: trade mark rights 6:0 (Class 46) United Kingdom Law firm asks alleged file-sharers to incriminate themselves (TorrentFreak) United States US General District appeals court rules customers of company who misappropriate… [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Writing in 1927 in Whitney v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713, this Court upheld the press’ right to publish information of great public concern obtained from documents stolen by a third party. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
” United States courts have long struggled to differentiate patentable inventions from ordinary innovation. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm
The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (where Sgt. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
Supp. 2d 98, 114 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citing Whitney v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
In addition to her contribution to that 1st trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, we noted,Des Forges also gave expert testimony in national courts, the United Nations, the Organization of African Unity, and the national legislatures of Belgium, France, and the United States. [read post]
