Search for: "Williams v. United States Marshal" Results 121 - 140 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
After federal judge Learned Hand denied Marshall’s habeas petition, the Supreme Court said in Marshall v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:36 pm by Ben Sheffner
Or did they disagree with Chief Justice Marshall when he wrote, "The Government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 1:36 pm
"-Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury V. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the United States, however, constitutional adjudication does not work that way. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Brewer, The United States a Christian Nation (1905) Louis Dembitz Brandeis, The Jewish Problem, How to Solve It  (1915 & 1919) William H. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States ; United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]