Search for: "Wilson v. Grant County" Results 121 - 140 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am by Law Lady
MITCHELL, Appellee. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Relocation of child -- No error in denying mother's motion for temporary order permitting relocation of child to another county or in granting father's emergency motion for return of child -- Order did not change parenting plan, but instead required mother to return child to county, consistent with previously ordered parenting planMELISSA KERSHAW, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Once the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cyan, the filings appeared to slow. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:07 am by Giles Peaker
Hertfordshire County Council v Davies (2020) EWHC 838 (QB) An application on the issue of notice under CPR 83.13(8) on permission to issue a High Court writ. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
            Defendant requests additional time to attempt to find an attorney willing to take this case and/or to conduct research at the County Law Library to be in a better position to proceed pro se with the help of litigation resources available at the law library and the guidance of the library's well-versed staff. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In Courtroom 2 on Wednesday 23 May 2012 is the appeal of Gow v Grant, on appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Walgreen Hastings Co., 126 P.2d 774 (N.M. 1998); but see Wilson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council, heard 7 – 9 February 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
County of San Diego, No. 05-56401, 05-56559 "Dismissal rulings, grant of a motion to strike under the California anti-SLAPP law, and an award of attorney's fees for defendants are reversed in part where, contrary to the ruling below, certain of county supervisor's hostile public statements directed at a company owning and managing several local mobile home parks were actionable. [read post]