Search for: "Woods v. Johnson" Results 121 - 140 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
By that time, the Republican Party had gained control in the state, lifting "scalawag" William Woods Holden of Hillsborough into the Governor's office (though he was first appointed Military Governor by President Johnson in 1865). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Claire Page v Woodely and Earley Chronicle. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 2:00 am by David Fowler
This has been the standard since the Florida Supreme Court decided the case of Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week issued an odd and confusing opinion in a case styled Johnson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:56 pm by Paul Caron
Johnson (Florida State): On December 3, the Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:49 am
As a result of cases like Johnson v City of New York, the City has now taken an "aggressive stance" against claims brought by wounded bystanders who sue for injuries caused by stray police bullets. [read post]