Search for: "Young v. Long et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
A recent study reported that “parents experienced long-term emotional distress and substantive disruption to family and daily life” following an E. coli O157:H7 infection in the family.[40] B. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
A recent study reported that “parents experienced long-term emotional distress and substantive disruption to family and daily life” following an E. coli O157:H7 infection in the family.[40] B. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Approximately half of the children who suffer HUS require dialysis, and at least 5% of those who survive have long-term renal impairment. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am
”[59] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[60] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are twenty-five years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not really available and remains controversial.[61] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function, and it… [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:30 am
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:08 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:22 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:43 am
See Persis International, Inc. et al v. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Supreme Court – even Marshall and Brennan had to agree with Rehnquist et al. that the evidence against the hapless criminal defendant should not be suppressed.) [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
Leroy Carhart in Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Poisson, et al., and Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Mike, it's not solo inventors or patent trolls that are flooding the USPTO with incremental concepts; it's IBM, Microsoft, Cisco, Apple, et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[43] Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) E. coli O157:H7 infections can lead to a severe, life-threatening complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).[44] HUS accounts for the majority of the acute deaths and chronic injuries caused by the… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
Mitchel of the Ontario Superior Court made a ruling in the Estate of Victor Hugh Priebe (Royal Trust v University of Western Ontario et al). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
MASON et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLOWERS, INC., et al., Debtors. [read post]
