Search for: "Application of Stevens" Results 1381 - 1400 of 4,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 9:43 am by Ross J. Altman
The Plan does not include detail on how the reduction in applicable bureaucracy will be achieved. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:55 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Community Humanitarian Assn., Inc. v Town of Ramapo, 137 AD3d 736, 738)” – Steven Silverberg [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
The judge must, on request, give a copy of the inventory to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken and to the applicant for the warrant.Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 41(f)(1)(D). [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
President Donald Trump’s Executive Order on domestic safety eliminates Privacy Act protection for foreigners, as it directs U.S. government agencies to “ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information,” but only if doing so is “consistent with applicable law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
 With the AmeriKat whisker deep in her own trial preparation, she has had to rely on one of her favorite courtroom teammates and IP legal eagle, Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), to summarize 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  For those that were busy braving the dark London streets for last minute present buying instead, the ever succinct Steven Willis (Bristows) reports on the evening's festivities: "Andrew recapped that in 2016, there were 18 Patents Court judgments on issues of validity and/or infringement. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The fact that the Supreme Court in Martinez confined its ruling to trial counsel cases could simply reflect the traditional practice of judicial modesty: The Court did not say that the principle goes further because, given the facts before it, there was no occasion to consider its potential application to other cases.So why, according to the State of Texas, shouldn’t Martinez and Trevino be deemed to apply to a claim like Davila’s? [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that by “the end of the hearing, it seemed clear that while a majority of the court is hesitant to go as far” as the lawyer for the band as “in forcing the patent office to accept nearly every application that comes its way, the justices are deeply sceptical about the rule that led it to rebuff The Slants. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm by Steve Kalar
  Image of “Double Count” from https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9PnNSvZcshU/WEdUOag1zSI/AAAAAAAAHsc/mgbI9lunELsPqEFhfWtZ0_rYey8ObtCBACLcB/s320/54472_double_count_wharton01f.png Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: We have consistently held in our post-Stevens precedent that generally applicable laws apply to Native American tribes unless Congress expressly provides otherwise. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBristowsby Steven Willis In a judgment handed down at the end of last week, Arnold J has indicated his intention to make a reference to the CJEU concerning the interpretation of Article 3(d) of the SPC Regulation i.e. the requirement for the marketing authorisation (“MA”) on which an SPC application is based to be the first MA placing the product (active ingredient or combination of active ingredients) on the market as a medicinal product. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Raymond Gruender, who is 53, was appointed to the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Steven Colloton, who just turned 54 on January 9, is a judge on the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Ronald Mann
Representing the state, Steven Wu insisted that the statute is aimed only at “bait-and-switch” pricing – when a retailer posts a single price but then asks for a higher price at the register for customers who pay with cards. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:45 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Steven Meredith, No. 110,520 (Riley)Motion to clarify KORA registration status (petition for review)Kai Tate Mann[Affirmed; Stegall; August 4, 2017]Retroactive application of KORA unconstitutional for nonsex offendersState v. [read post]