Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Virginia State Board of Elections, 580 U.S. ___, ___; and a State’s consideration of race in making a districting decision is narrowly tailored if the State has “good reasons” for believing that its decision is necessary in order to comply with the VRA, Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Virginia State Board of Elections, 580 U.S. ___, ___; and a State’s consideration of race in making a districting decision is narrowly tailored if the State has “good reasons” for believing that its decision is necessary in order to comply with the VRA, Cooper v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:13 am
Quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
§18 provides for the defense and indemnification of officers and employees of public entities which are defined as "(i) a county, city, town, village or any other political subdivision or civil division of the state, (ii) a school district, board of cooperative educational services, or any other governmental entity or combination or association of governmental entities operating a public school, college, community college or university, (iii) a public improvement or… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:21 am
Arlen Bean of the 8th District Court of Appeals in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Hungary v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:18 am
Loya was told by United States government agents, and told Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
As Missouri v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
However, [the witness later] testified under oath that he had made no efforts to travel to the United States for his deposition, had within his possession a five-year visa, and could travel to the United States at any time. . . . [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
The first case before the court, Rutledge v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court in the landmark case of Arizona v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:12 am
Before the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:34 pm
This sentiment, however, was not shared by the majority of the panel.In United States v. [read post]
