Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
– Writing for the Court in FCC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
"** Claims of exception to the mootness doctrine typically require the court to consider three issues: [a] is the question presented of a substantial public nature; [b] is there is a need for an authoritative determination for the future guidance of public officers; and [3] is there a likelihood of future recurrence of the question [see Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707].The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
"** Claims of exception to the mootness doctrine typically require the court to consider three issues: [a] is the question presented of a substantial public nature; [b] is there is a need for an authoritative determination for the future guidance of public officers; and [3] is there a likelihood of future recurrence of the question [see Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707].The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 2, 2011 Danos v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am
Today's guest post is authored by The Honorable David Langham is the Deputy Chief Judge of Compensation Claims for the Florida Office of Judges of Compensation Claims and Division of Administrative Hearings. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" * Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" * Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
" Noting that §3020-a does not define "discipline," the Court of Appeals said that §3020-a authorizes a hearing officer to impose as a penalty "a written reprimand, a fine, suspension . . . without pay, or dismissal. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
In Adams & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 9:15 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear, on March 1, 2021, whether administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Michelle Lee raises yet another separation of powers issue between the courts and the patent office. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Supreme Court denied the CPLR Article 78 petition filed by a former New York City police officer [Plaintiff] seeking a court order annulling the determination of the New York City Police Pension Fund [Fund] denying Plaintiff's application for vested retirement benefits. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Supreme Court denied the CPLR Article 78 petition filed by a former New York City police officer [Plaintiff] seeking a court order annulling the determination of the New York City Police Pension Fund [Fund] denying Plaintiff's application for vested retirement benefits. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:39 am
Supreme Court Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35 (13 July 2011) Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brighton and Hove City Council v PM & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 795 (12 July 2011) Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803 (12 July 2011) Jones & Anor v Ruth & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 804 (12 July 2011) Shovelar & Ors… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
The post WashU Expert: SCOTUS decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
We later applied the Arbuckle rule to a plea before a commissioner in juvenile court, where the parties impliedly stipulated that the judicial officer could act as a temporary judge. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
The case, Villanueva v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
In Hodge v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Threatening to use administrative authorityIn an Associated Press news item dated August 16, 2014 by Paul J. [read post]
