Search for: "Courts v. Campbell"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Ex. 114, ¶5, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Whereas Weird Al’s Grammy-winning song fits snugly within the parody definition (and Yankovic always seeks permission, in order “to maintain relationships”), Dumb Starbucks position is questionable.ParodyIn the landmark decision addressing fair-use in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc the US Supreme Court stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Campbell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Increasingly doing doctrinal work—Campbell, then Blanch v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
No, just a glass-- but beer's best tasted in glass that's waisted" (here), soon-to-be-guest-Kat Darren Meale provided us with a commentary on the design law issues arising from Utopia Tableware v BBP Marketing Ltd [2013] EWHC 3483, a decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell sitting as an Enterprise Judge in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) for England and Wales. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
14 In Eldred v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J first referred back to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 WLR 1232 where Lord Nicholls established that breach of confidence was better encapsulated by another concept, that of misuse of private information, and commented that the tort, however labelled, “affords respect for one aspect of an individual’s privacy”. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
In terms of the law, the Supreme Court rejected that argument over 100 years ago, and has been reaffirmed numerous times in cases like Campbell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:59 am
Campbell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Campbell, Judge.Representing Appellants: Angela C. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
I really like the following description of "transformative" use in the Supreme Court's Campbell ruling:"The central purpose of this investigation is to see, in Justice Story's words, whether the new work merely 'supersede[s] the objects' of the original creation, Folsom v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
Contract law: Consider Campbell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
DH and CB (Respondents) and STATE OF WYOMING (Petitioner) Docket Number: S-13-0095URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Campbell County the Honorable Dan R. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
There is extensive caselaw on this issue, culminating in the Supreme Court case of Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 which is likely to be extremely persuasive if not technically binding. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Libel and Privacy Trials this Term in Northern Ireland There are four libel jury trials listed in Northern Ireland this term: 20 January 2014, O’Kane v Sunday Newspapers and Campbell v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 4 days 23 January 2014, Loony v Hanna 10 February 2014, Patterson v Ministry of Defence, Time estimate, 10 days 12 February 2014, Watson v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 3 days We thank Olivia O’Kane of Carson… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
MOATS v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Campbell Alliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:47 am
” Before this case, a good example of the awarding of damages in an undefended infringement case can be found in 2012's Adobe v Thompson(here). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm
Land Court Update - Huelo Hui, Campbell Real Estate Contract Interpretation Update - Kutkowski v. [read post]
